Industry News


Malt Academy Saskatchewan 2020 – Virtual

Friday, November 13, 2020
Virtual event (via Zoom)

SaskBarley and the Canadian Malting Barley Technical Centre have teamed up to bring you another Saskatchewan-focused Malt Academy this fall! This half-day, virtual course will provide Saskatchewan barley producers with a complete overview of the malting industry, domestically and globally, helping them to make informed decisions around growing and marketing their crops. 
See full agenda

Course is free for registered Saskatchewan barley producers and members of Saskatchewan’s barley industry.

Email with your name, business name and contact information.


CBRC commits $2.7 million to USask CDC barley breeding activities

September 15, 2020 (Saskatoon, SK) – The The Canadian Barley Research Coalition (CBRC) announced today it will invest $2.7 million over five years in the University of Saskatchewan’s Crop Development Centre (CDC) through a core breeding agreement to develop barley varieties with improved agronomics, disease resistance and end-use quality. 

The CBRC is a collaboration among the Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission (SaskBarley), Alberta Barley and Manitoba Crop Alliance (formerly the Manitoba Wheat and Barley Growers Association).

“The agreement with the CDC ensures that western Canadian barley farmers can expect new and improved barley varieties from a world-class, multi-million dollar breeding program over the next five years,” says CBRC Interim Chair Jason Skotheim and SaskBarley Chair.

“This investment into the CDC breeding program will produce deliverables that will allow our farmers to stay competitive,” Skotheim says. “The last round of producer funding provided to the CDC saw the registration of two new malting varieties, one feed variety and one hulless variety. In the next five years we expect another three varieties to be released. This will have major benefits to our farmers.”

The CDC, which is known for research excellence in developing high-performing crop varieties, is uniquely set up to deliver effective results for western Canadian agriculture. The new agreement will enable the program to expand and capitalize on new opportunities.

“The keys to past success within the CDC barley breeding program have been the skilled staff, the in-house malt and molecular marker labs and the ability to evaluate large numbers of breeding lines,” Skotheim says. “This CBRC funding will support these pillars moving forward.”

Investment in CDC plant breeding activities has helped create new markets and opportunities for a wide variety of crop producers, said CDC barley breeder Aaron Beattie. 

“We are very pleased with the long-term funding from the CBRC and appreciate the confidence they have in our program,” he says. “We look forward to continuing to deliver improved varieties to the Canadian barley industry and providing value to all within the value chain.”

Finalizing this agreement with the CDC was the first order of business for the CBRC, officially formed earlier this year, and is in line with the organization’s goal of facilitating long-term investments aimed at improving profitability and competitiveness for western Canadian barley farmers.

The organization will also provide funding for qualifying regional projects that align with variety development and agronomic priorities.

For more information:

Delaney Seiferling
SaskBarley Communications Manager

Erin Tateson
Interim Communications Manager
Alberta Wheat and Barley Commissions

Kate Menold
MCA Communications Coordinator

Victoria Dinh
USask Media Relations


“Collaboratively investing in barley’s varietal development is key to keeping barley farmers competitive. This core breeding agreement with the CDC will lead to enhanced barley varieties and secures our future with access to competitive and profitable varieties. Stronger agronomic packages and higher yields combined with quality traits that meet the needs of the brewing and malting industry will be the return on this barley breeding investment.”

David Bishop, Alberta Barley Chair

“Manitoba Crop Alliance understands how important it is for breeders to secure long-term funding when developing new varieties and considers programs aimed at improving the competitiveness and profitability of barley farms in western Canada a major priority. We are thrilled to be doing our part to help make this possible through this collaboration with our sister organizations in Saskatchewan and Alberta”

Fred Greig, Manitoba Crop Alliance Chair



SaskBarley issues research call

The Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission (SaskBarley) is pleased to announce a call for Letters of Intent (LOI) for barley related research.  SaskBarley was established in 2013 and is led by a producer-elected Board of Directors from across Saskatchewan.  SaskBarley’s mission is to identify, develop and support research, market development, and extension initiatives that ensure the long-term profitability and sustainability of barley for Saskatchewan producers.  Since its inception SaskBarley has made the support of research a key priority for their organization by allocating over 60% of their annual budget to research.

The primary goals of SaskBarley’s research program is to increase profitability of barley production for barley producers through:

  • Yield gains and agronomic efficiencies
  • Varietal uptake
  • Enhanced desirable market quality characteristics and specifications
  • Yield parity between malt and feed barley
  • Best management practices
  • Understanding end-user and consumer needs and aligning barley specifications with production outputs
  • Value added opportunities for barley in feed, food, malt or industrial end uses

Available Funding:

SaskBarley’s Board is pleased to announce the approval of $1M in funding to be directed to the research supported under this call.  It will be considered an asset if a researcher articulates a plan to acquire additional matching funding from other source(s) outside of this call.  

Upon approval from the researcher, the following barley research funders may also review the research proposals under this call: Canadian Barley Research Coalition, Alberta Barley Commission, Manitoba Crop Alliance, Brewing and Malting Barley Research Institute, Beef Cattle Research Council and the Western Grains Research Foundation. 

Application Process:

  • September 14, 2020: Call for Letter of Intent (LOI) Opens (LOI template)
  • October 16, 2020: LOI is due
  • December 1, 2020: Request for full proposal notification
  • January 15, 2021: Full Proposals Due on or before March 1, 2021: Notification of funding to successful recipients

If you are interested in submitting an LOI please complete the attached LOI Template and send it to by October 16thth, 2020.

Thank you for your interest.

Glyphosate and malt barley crops

Peter Watts from the Canadian Malting Barley Technical Centre discusses his advice to farmers re: using glyphosate on malt barley crops this year in this short video. His main message: don’t do it.

Watch now

SaskBarley now taking applications for 2020/21 scholarships

The Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission (SaskBarley) is now taking applications for its 2020/21 scholarships.

The scholarship program, introduced last year, is an opportunity to invest in promising university students who are carrying out university-level research that can help SaskBarley achieve its organizational goals. It is also designed to encourage and support new research that will benefit Saskatchewan’s barley sector.

The program will include two scholarships, one at a PHD/graduate level for $5,000 and one at an undergraduate level for $2000.

These scholarships are open to any post-secondary students enrolled in part- or full-time studies focused specifically on barley research. Funding is for one year, but can be renewed.

To apply, or learn more, visit

For more information:

Delaney Seiferling
Communications Manager

Fungicide Application in Cereals

Early Bird Doesn’t Always Get the Worm

By Mitchell Japp, PAg, Provincial Specialist Cereal Crops, Regina

June 2020

Wheat crop at herbicide timing.
Wheat crop at herbicide timing.

Seeding is complete and in-crop spraying is well underway. Some growers may consider including a full or partial rate of a fungicide with the in-crop application of herbicides on cereal crops. Recent evidence suggests that including a fungicide with an herbicide application is not beneficial and could be detrimental in both the current and future years.

Adding a fungicide, such as propiconazole, into the sprayer along with the herbicide seems to make sense theoretically, saving another sprayer pass and the direct cost of the fungicide is relatively small. It may also appear like good insurance against later disease issues. However, both recent and historical studies on the prairies have shown that there is no benefit to either a full or half rate of fungicide, even if that fungicide remains active for another seven to 10 days after application.

Dr. Kelly Turkington, with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, led a research project looking at the impact of fungicide and herbicide timing in barley production from 2010-2012. They added a half-rate of propiconazole to herbicide timing at the two to three leaf growth stage and five to six leaf growth stage. Results showed that the disease levels were higher on early treatments compared to flag-leaf timing. Crop yields, along with several key quality parameters for barley, were optimized with the fungicide at flag leaf timing. They also tested a dual application, with an early application and a flag leaf application. There was no improvement compared to a single application at flag leaf. Additionally, they observed that delaying herbicide application to the five to six leaf stage from the two to three leaf stage, barley yield declined due to early weed competition. Weed control was excellent at all sites in the study, but in regular field operations delayed herbicide application could lead to reduced weed control which would lead to increased weed seed production. (CPJS 95:525-537)

Another study by Dr. Sheri Stryhorst updates earlier research conducted in Saskatchewan. The earlier research in Saskatchewan was conducted on irrigated land in the early 1990s. The early Saskatchewan work on irrigated fields did not lead to notable trends in yield, but disease was significantly reduced with fungicide timing at the flag leaf stage compared to earlier applications (at herbicide timing). (CJPS 94: 205-207). Dr. Strydhorst’s, with Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, is using modern varieties in an intensive management system, with zero-till operations, similar to what many producers will be doing on their farms. The study focused on tight rotations that may be more susceptible to disease risk, using a canola-wheat rotation, although two crops is not really a rotation. The study was conducted in 2018 and 2019 at four location includes multiple factors and treatments, including variety, fungicide rates, fungicide timing and fungicide mode of action.

Their findings were similar to other research. There was no yield improvement or disease control improvement with a single fungicide application at either herbicide timing or at PGR (plant growth regulator) timing (GS 30-32). However, there were considerable reductions in disease levels and on average a 9 per cent yield increase when fungicide was applied at either flag leaf timing or anthesis timing. In 2019, the yield response was even more notable, with a 12-17 and a seven to 15 per cent yield benefit with a fungicide application at flag leaf or anthesis timing, respectively. They also looked at dual applications, with the first fungicide application at either herbicide or PGR timing compared to dual fungicide applications when the first fungicide application was at flag leaf timing. In most site years, there was no significant yield advantage of dual fungicide applications over single fungicide applications at flag leaf or anthesis timing. (This study is not yet published, but is discussed on The Growing Point podcast).

These results are consistent with recent research that also found that in most cases a single fungicide application at anthesis (Fusarium Head Blight timing) is sufficient for control of leaf diseases (Crop Protection 112: 343-349). In a severe outbreak, managing leaf disease at flag leaf timing may be advantageous, instead of waiting until FHB timing. Recent work out of the northern Great Plains in the U.S. found that a routine fungicide application at flag leaf when the disease risk is low, only generated a positive net return less than one-third of the time (Plant Health Progress 19:288-294). The goal is to protect the upper canopy from leaf disease as yield is derived from the upper canopy. However, in some unusual conditions, there may be a benefit to an early fungicide application. Research out of North Dakota State University has shown that early fungicide applications may result in a small yield benefit, but only in a continuous wheat on wheat “rotation.” They did not observe any benefit to an early season fungicide when a wheat followed another crop. So, just don’t grow wheat on wheat.

Farmers are living with the reality of herbicide resistant weeds. Fungicide resistance is also possible. There are reports of fungicide resistant Fusarium in the north-east United States. Now is the time to be cautious to delay fungicide resistance development. Unnecessary applications and applying the fungicide at a lower rate than recommended (which may be sub-lethal) increases the risk of developing fungicide resistance.

So, while the direct costs of early season fungicide are not high, there is no evidence to suggest there are sufficient benefits, economic or otherwise, to justify the expense. And, there may be additional costs due to delayed weed control and the potential for development of fungicide resistance.

Good fungicide management decisions come down to an understanding of the disease triangle. In order to have the disease, you need a susceptible host, a virulent pathogen and the right environmental conditions. Check the leaf disease resistance ratings in the Varieties of Grain Crops. Scout your fields and watch for signs of the disease. Pay attention to weather patterns. The primary goal is to protect the upper canopy so those leaves can be contributing to yield. Determine if the crop is worth further investment to protect it from leaf disease, based on yield potential, price, potential loss due to disease and the cost of the fungicide application. There are a lot of factors to consider, but early-season fungicides generally shouldn’t be one of those considerations.

Stay ahead of FHB this growing season

You can help to limit the presence of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) in your harvested wheat, barley and oats, and protect the marketability of your grain, by taking a proactive approach to managing fusarium head blight (FHB) this growing season.

Commonly known as vomitoxin, DON can be produced when the fungal disease FHB infects cereal crops. Its presence can limit grain’s end uses and marketing potential, as most importing countries have strict limits on DON levels. Shipments that exceed acceptable levels of DON could be rejected, at tremendous cost to the industry and may impact Canada’s reputation as a producer of high-quality cereal grains.

FHB can be identified by premature bleaching and salmon-coloured fungal growth on the heads of crops it has infected, with symptoms showing up approximately three weeks after infection. To help keep marketing options open for your harvested grain and protect your investment, Keep it Clean recommends the following practices to manage FHB:

• Grow the most FHB-resistant varieties available in areas at risk for FHB.
• Plant clean seed and consider a seed treatment in high-risk areas.
• Scout for stage, not symptoms, and apply fungicide when there is an elevated risk of FHB.
• If FHB is identified, send samples of harvested grain for testing to detect the presence of mycotoxins, such as DON.
• Rotate away from cereals on FHB-infected fields for 1-2 years.
• Use a Combination of Best Management Practices to Control Fusarium.

Be sure to make use of the materials available through provincial commodity groups and agricultural departments, including risk maps, to inform your decisions and help limit the spread and severity of outbreaks. For more information about how staying ahead of FHB can help you protect your investment and the marketability of your cereal crop, visit

This update has been provided by Keep it Clean. Additional resources and tips for growing a market-ready cereal crop are available at

Recommendations regarding chlormequat (e.g. Manipulator)

*Originally published by the Canadian Malting Barley Technical Centre

  • Farmers should consult their grain buyer, as well as thoroughly review their contract, with regard to the use of Chlormequat chloride on malting barley. Many malting barley buyers in Canada will not accept malting barley treated with Chlormequat chloride.
  • To avoid potential market access issues, malting barley treated with Chlormequat chloride should not be delivered into the commercial grain system without the knowledge of the grain buyer. 
  • Producers are encouraged to investigate the cost/benefit of using Chlormequat chloride in their area (see study by L.A. Perrott, S.M.Strydhorst et al, link below).
  • Given risks associated with the use of Chlormequat chloride (e.g. Manipulator) on malting barley in relation to customer acceptance, market access and potential impact on malting barley quality, the CMBTC recommends producers not use Chlormequat chloride on malting barley until such time as these risks have been addressed.

Background information

  • In 2019 the plant growth regulator Manipulator (Chlormequat chloride) was registered for use on barley in Canada.  
  • In March of 2020, it was reviewed under the Canada Grain Council’s Domestic MRL Policy (link below) as administered by Cereals Canada, which resulted in the classification of Chlormequat chloride (e.g. Manipulator) as “Green/no recommendations” status for barley, with an exception for use on malting barley for which it is classified “Amber/Be informed” status, which signals: Be informed. Treated grain may not be accepted by some grain buyers. Consult with your grain buyer before using this product.
  • Chlormequat chloride/Manipulator is listed under “Products of Concern” in the 2020 Keep it Clean! campaign*with the following statement highlighted in the information sheet: “Before using chlormequat on malt barley, growers are advised to check with their grain buyer to confirm contract obligations and acceptance.” 
  • In a study entitled Effect of Cultivar and Agronomic Management on Feed Barley Production in Alberta Environments by L.A. Perrott et al, the investigators found that advanced management techniques had negligible effects on lodging and grain quality in 10 feed barley cultivars evaluated. Advanced management included supplemental post-emergence N, the plant growth regulator (PGR) chlormequat chloride (CCC), and two foliar fungicide applications.
  • A study published in 2020 by McMillan et al (reference below) found that chlormequat-treated barley produced malt with somewhat reduced levels of enzymes and poorer endosperm modification, although the effects were relatively small.  

*Keep it Clean! is a multi-platform communications campaign aimed at farmers and designed to emphasize the importance of using only registered crop input products and always according to label instructions; this is to ensure Canadian grain is market ready and doesn’t create any market access issue.

Referenced links:
  • Canada Grains Council Domestic MRL Policy link:
  • Effect of Cultivar and Agronomic Management on Feed Barley Production in Alberta Environments – Published in the Canadian Journal of Plant Science June 21, 2018. L.A. Perrott, S.M. Strydhorst, L.M. Hall, R.C. Yang, D. Pauly, K.S. Gill, and R. Bowness.
  • Effects of plant growth regulator application on the malting quality of barley (2020). McMillan, T., Tidemann, B., O’Donovan, J., and Izydorczyk, M.S. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 100:2082-2089

Western wheat and barley commissions concerned about 2020 research activities

Saskatoon, SK; Calgary, AB; Carman, MB (April 22, 2020) – The Canadian Wheat Research Coalition (CWRC) and the Canadian Barley Research Coalition (CBRC) are asking Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) to continue important wheat and barley research activities at AAFC’s western Canadian research stations in 2020.

Urgent action is required to save the 2020 AAFC field, lab, and greenhouse activities for wheat and barley research projects. This farmer-funded research is critical to the competitiveness of Canada’s agriculture industry and cancelling project activities will have repercussions. Many of the current projects funded by the CWRC, CBRC, and individual crop commissions are multi-year, multi-site, and multi-cooperator endeavors. The impact of disruptions to this work needs to be considered on a project-to-project and program-to-program basis to minimize the loss of both future productivity and the potential contributions of previous projects.

Given the complexity of the situation, it is necessary to evaluate the level of risk and develop safety protocols on a regional basis. Prairie universities have established plans that will allow them to safely continue their research activities in 2020. Private research institutions have also put plans in place to conduct field research this year with appropriate measures to ensure employee safety.

“We are facing an unprecedented situation with respect to the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic and the safety of researchers and other staff is our top priority,” said CWRC Chair Jason Lenz. “The universities and private plant breeders have found safe options to conduct their research. We’re confident AAFC can also create a plan to continue critical research and provide clarity to western Canadian farmers.”

“As funders and partners in research, with a goal to support the agriculture industry, we will assist researchers wherever we can,” says CBRC Interim-Chair Jason Skotheim. “We are requesting that AAFC consult our member organizations to explore opportunities, communicate contingency plans and discuss any potential required adjustments in contract terms and conditions as soon as possible.”

Going forward, both the CWRC and CBRC will remain committed to minimizing the impact of the pandemic on the current and future success of the industry while maintaining appropriate measures to ensure health and safety.

The CWRC is a collaboration of the Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission, the Alberta Wheat Commission, and Manitoba Wheat and Barley Growers Association. The CBRC is a collaboration of the Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission, the Alberta Barley Commission and Manitoba Wheat and Barley Growers Association.

For more information, please contact:

Delaney Seiferling
Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission
P: 306-250-1099

Victoria Decker
Alberta Wheat and Barley Commissions

Kate Menold
Manitoba Wheat and Barley Growers Association

Dallas Carpenter
Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission


Western Applied Research Corporation annual Crop Opportunity Meeting

SaskBarley is a sponsor of the Western Applied Research Corporation’s Crop Opportunity Meeting on March 04, 2020 at the Dekker Centre in North Battleford.  This event is open to everyone and features presentations from industry experts on current issues in Saskatchewan agriculture.

See full agenda

Register today at
Pre-register: $25 (before February 28) Standard registration: $35
Lunch included
Registration: 8:30AM
Event: 9:00-4:00PM
Contact: 306-247-2001 or